Home

Recent publications

Most recent publications on my current research topics: digital journalism, disinformation and artificial intelligence.






Recent publications

INTRODUCTION — March 2025

Westlund, O., Boyles, J. L., Guo, L., Saldaña, M., Salaverría, R., Thomson, T. J., & Wu, S. (2025). Digital Journalism (Studies): An Agenda for the FutureDigital Journalism. DOI:10.1080/21670811.2025.2474530

Abstract

Digital Journalism has an important role to play in encouraging and publishing research with societal relevance that advances digital journalism studies as a field. In this article we discuss the multiple types of articles we publish: research articles, conceptual articles, review articles, advancing methods articles and commentaries. We also introduce you to several great examples of such articles, as well as introduce the growing number of articles that have received outstanding article awards over the years. Finally, we present our revised editorial agenda that will guide our priorities for the editorial processing of article submissions in the year(s) to come. The editorial agenda consists of five key thematic areas, each featuring carefully selected bullet points outlining our key research priorities. We set the context for each of these thematic areas by positioning them in relation to some of the research we have published in recent years.



RESEARCH ARTICLE — February 2025

Larraz, I., Salaverría, R., & Serrano, J. (2024). Fact-checking automation: An ethnographic approach to newsroomsMedijske Studije / Media Studies, 15(30), 51-71. DOI:10.20901/ms.15.30.3

Abstract

This article explores the adoption of artificial intelligence-driven automation tools in fact-checking newsrooms, focusing on their potential to enhance verification efficiency and reach. Using digital ethnography and semi-structured interviews with executives, journalists, and engineers from Duke Reporters’ Lab (USA) and Full Fact (UK), the study examines the motivations for adopting these tools, their impact on fact-checking practices, perceived benefits, user attitudes, and measurable outcomes. Findings reveal significant variations in approaches and results across newsrooms, underscoring ongoing challenges in implementing automation tools within complex workflows. This work advances understanding of automation’s role in fact-checking and offers insights for future research.





PREPRINT — January 2025

Arcos, I., Rosso, P., & Salaverría, R. (2024). Divergent Emotional Patterns in Disinformation on Social Media? An Analysis of Tweets and TikToks about the DANA in ValenciaProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2025), Porto, Portugal, February 23-25, 2025. arXiv:2501.18640. DOI:10.48550/arXiv.2501.18640

Abstract

This study investigates the dissemination of disinformation on social media platforms during the DANA event (DANA is a Spanish acronym for Depresion Aislada en Niveles Altos ´ , translating to high-altitude isolated depression) that resulted in extremely heavy rainfall and devastating floods in Valencia, Spain, on October 29, 2024. We created a novel dataset of 650 TikTok and X posts, which was manually annotated to differentiate between disinformation and trustworthy content. Additionally, a Few-Shot annotation approach with GPT-4o achieved substantial agreement (Cohen’s kappa of 0.684) with manual labels. Emotion analysis revealed that disinformation on X is mainly associated with increased sadness and fear, while on TikTok, it correlates with higher levels of anger and disgust. Linguistic analysis using the LIWC dictionary showed that trustworthy content utilizes more articulate and factual language, whereas disinformation employs negations, perceptual words, and personal anecdotes to appear credible. Audio analysis of TikTok posts highlighted distinct patterns: trustworthy audios featured brighter tones and robotic or monotone narration, promoting clarity and credibility, while disinformation audios leveraged tonal variation, emotional depth, and manipulative musical elements to amplify engagement. In detection models, SVM+TF-IDF achieved the highest F1-Score, excelling with limited data. Incorporating audio features into roberta-large-bne improved both Accuracy and F1-Score, surpassing its text-only counterpart and SVM in Accuracy. GPT-4o Few-Shot also performed well, showcasing the potential of large language models for automated disinformation detection. These findings demonstrate the importance of leveraging both textual and audio features for improved disinformation detection on multimodal platforms like TikTok.




BOOK CHAPTER — November 2024

Salaverría, R. (2024). Metrics-driven news: the impact of data analytics on journalism. In S. Eldrige II, D. Cheruiyot, S. Banjac, & J. Swart (Eds.). Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies, Second Edition (pp. 166-174). London: Routledge. DOI:10.4324/9781003334774-20

Abstract

The use of analytical tools to measure the size and behaviour of the audience has become a hallmark of digital media. In the past, print media, radio and television used audience measurement systems primarily for advertising and sales-related purposes. In today’s digital ecosystem, however, data analysis has become more sophisticated and has begun to shape news production, giving rise to metrics-driven news. Based on a historical review of the use of audience and data measurement systems by the media, this chapter describes the current uses of analytical tools in newsrooms, through examples of their recent implementation in international media. The effects of web analytics on news agenda and the roles of these technologies in the current developments of automated, AI-driven journalism are theoretically discussed. All in all, this chapter explores the far-reaching impact of digital metrics, pointing out the opportunities and challenges the new analytical tools pose to journalism, as well as their ethical implications.




BOOK CHAPTER — December 2024

Larraz, I., & Salaverría, R. (2024). Chatbots y fact-checks: un estudio sobre el uso de la inteligencia artificial generativa entre los fact-checkers. En Murcia-Verdú, F. J., & Ramos-Antón, R. (coods.), La inteligencia artificial y la transformación del periodismo. Narrativas, aplicaciones y herramientas (pp. 179-202). Sevilla: Comunicación Social. ISBN: 978-84-17600-98-3

Book abstract

El libro La inteligencia artificial y la transformación del periodismo realiza un diagnóstico de las herramientas y aplicaciones que utiliza la inteligencia artificial (IA) para crear nuevas narrativas y generar contenido.

Integrado por nueve capítulos que aportan nuevas visiones sobre las posibles aplicaciones transformadoras de esta nueva disciplina, este libro ofrece una visión estructurada y bien documentada que compone una excelente muestra de los últimos avances científicos respecto al uso de la IA en el periodismo desde diversas perspectivas teóricas y metodológicas, entre ellas:
—La regulación de la IA en la Unión Europea.
—La preparación de los periodistas y las redacciones frente al desarrollo de los modelos de IA.
—Oportunidades y riesgos derivados de la implementación de la IA en los medios públicos europeos.
—Las posibilidades de futuro de la IA en el campo periodístico desde la óptica de la lingüística computacional.
—Los discursos periodisticos sobre la IA.
—La curación de contenidos orientada a la creación de textos periodísticos de calidad apoyados en modelos de IA.
—El funcionamiento de los chatbots de IA generativa para mejorar la distribución de información verificada.




RESEARCH ARTICLE — July 2024

Salaverría, R., Bachmann, I. & Magallón-Rosa, R. (2024). Desinformación y confianza en los medios: propuestas de actuaciónindex.comunicación, 14(2), 13-32. DOI:10.62008/ixc/14/02Yconfi

Abstract

Abstract

Disinformation has influenced public trust in democratic institutions, particularly the media. Through examples from countries with varying levels of democratic quality, it is demonstrated how disinformation is used to polarize and politically mobilize. The role of the media in this context is crucial, as trust in them depends on multiple interrelated factors, such as the impact of disinformation on news consumption and public trust, the psychological and sociocultural factors that affect vulnerability to disinformation, and technological advances, especially generative artificial intelligence. Based on this diagnosis, mechanisms of self-regulation and increased transparency are proposed as foundations to improve trust. Additionally, the need for academic research on the role of digital platforms and algorithms in the spread of dis­information and its impact on trust and democratic quality is emphasized.




BOOK CHAPTER — October 2024

Salaverría, R. (2024). Desinformación, una oportunidad para el periodismo. En Magallón, R. (coord.), Comprometidos con la verdad. Propuestas para combatir la desinformación (pp. 139-144). Madrid: CLABE. ISBN: 978-84-09-58924-1

Abstract

La desinformación es una amenaza global, pero también una oportunidad para el periodismo. Si el principal problema de los medios es su pérdida de credibilidad, la desinformación brinda una ocasión única para recuperar la reputación. Para eso, medios y periodistas deben abordar cambios.



RESEARCH ARTICLE — September 2024

Larraz, I., Salaverría, R., & Serrano, J. (2024). Combating Repeated Lies: Impact of Fact-checking on Persistent
Falsehoods by Politicians
. Media & Communication, 12, Article 8642. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8642

Abstract

The rise of repeated false claims within political discourse is undermining fact-checking efforts. By reiterating similar statements that perpetuate previous falsehoods, political actors shift from misinformation to deliberate disinformation and even propagandistic tactics. Through an analysis of 1,204 political fact-checks conducted by the Spanish fact-checking organization Newtral, this study quantifies and characterizes the prevalence of repeated false claims in political discourse, revealing that a substantial 24.8% of false statements are repeated, with each being repeated an average of four times. By delving into the nature and types of claims most susceptible to recurrence, the study identifies five primary patterns employed by political actors: nuanced variations, data manipulation, multilateral attacks, discourse qualification, and cumulative repetition. These tactics blur the lines between deception and self-correction. The annotated database of these repeated false statements can serve as a valuable resource for exploratory qualitative analysis as well as claim-matching research in automated fact-checking.




Books

Single-authored books, co-edited monographs and conference proceedings edited by Ramón Salaverría.



Keynotes

Ramón Salaverría: «La inteligencia artificial no viene a sustituir a los periodistas, sino a complementar su trabajo». Organizer: Cadena SER Euskadi. Bilbao. October 23, 2024.




Media & interviews

«La IA va a ser una revolución aún más profunda que la que supuso internet»El Correo (Bilbao), p. 48, June 11, 2024.

More:

Interviews

Media clipping



Teaching

On the academic year 2023-24, my colleague Clara González Tosat and I started the subject Artificial Intelligence in Journalism at the School of Communication, University of Navarra. Since then, we are exploring with students the use of AI in newswork: research, generation and distribution of news, and fact-checking. Watch this video that summarizes our pioneering experience.




Thoughts


El periodismo es como el café: hay que servirlo rápido, endulzarlo lo justo y no estropearlo con mala leche.

X post, August 25, 2014.


Author

Ramón Salaverría, PhD, MAE

Ramón Salaverría (2024)

Full Professor of Journalism at University of Navarra and Member of Academia Europæa (MAE). My research focuses on digital journalism and disinformation.

Author of over 300 scholarly publications, I am listed in the Stanford University ranking of the World’s most cited researchers. Award-winner of the ‘Researcher of the Year’ prize at the Roblon Awards, which recognizes excellence on media and communication research in Spanish-speaking countries.

With an extensive career as a researcher and leader of national and international research projects, I am currently the principal investigator of Iberifier, the Iberian digital media observatory funded by the European Commission. I chaired the Journalism Studies Section of ECREA, as well as the Committee of Experts on Increasing Resilience of Media (MSI-RES) at the Council of Europe.

I have served as visiting researcher at the University of Texas at Austin (USA), as well as a guest professor at a dozen universities in Europe and the Americas. I have delivered keynotes, workshops and training programs in more than 30 countries. 

Full bio & publications: web | pdf

Wikipedia: español | català

Política de Privacidad

Política de Cookies